Airoha Bluetooth Chip Flaws (CVE-2025-20700, 20701, 20702): Which Headphones Are at Risk and What to Do

Discover how critical Bluetooth vulnerabilities in Airoha chipsets found in top brands like Bose, Sony, and JBL could let attackers eavesdrop, steal data, and hijack calls. Learn how to stay protected.

Jul 02, 2025 - 10:40
Updated: 1 month ago
107.2k
Airoha Bluetooth Chip Flaws (CVE-2025-20700, 20701, 20702): Which Headphones Are at Risk and What to Do

Quick answer: Three flaws in Airoha Bluetooth chips, CVE-2025-20700, CVE-2025-20701 and CVE-2025-20702, were reported by ERNW researchers. They let an attacker within Bluetooth range talk to some headphones and earbuds without pairing and, in a chain, read data or control a paired phone. The practical risk is low for most users, and fixes depend on each device maker.

Key takeaways

  • The CVEs are CVE-2025-20700 (missing authentication for GATT), CVE-2025-20701 (missing authentication for BR/EDR) and CVE-2025-20702 (critical capabilities in a custom protocol).
  • ERNW researchers presented the work at TROOPERS 25. Check their write-up for the device list.
  • The attacker must be in Bluetooth range and needs strong technical skill, so mass exploitation is unlikely.
  • Fixes come as firmware from headphone makers, not from phone updates alone.
  • Update the headphone app, unpair unused devices and be careful with sensitive calls around unknown people.

What are the Airoha Bluetooth vulnerabilities?

Airoha makes Bluetooth chips used in many true wireless earbuds, headphones and speakers. Researchers at ERNW found three issues in the way some devices using Airoha chips handle connections and a custom management protocol. The CVE identifiers are:

CVEIssue
CVE-2025-20700Missing authentication for a GATT (Bluetooth Low Energy) service
CVE-2025-20701Missing authentication for the classic Bluetooth BR/EDR interface
CVE-2025-20702Critical capabilities exposed in a custom protocol

Look up each on the National Vulnerability Database for the official score and vendor references. The earlier version of this page quoted individual scores and a count of affected products, and we could not verify the figures against the primary sources, so use ERNW write-up and NVD for them.

How could an attack work?

In outline, as described by the researchers:

  1. The attacker is within Bluetooth range of a vulnerable device, in practice within a few metres.
  2. Because the device does not require authentication on some interfaces, the attacker can connect without pairing.
  3. The attacker can read or write data on the headset, and with the custom protocol flaw, may extract information such as pairing keys.
  4. With those keys, the attacker could impersonate the headset towards the paired phone, and issue commands such as starting a call or listening through the phone.

This was shown as research with proof of concept work. It needs time, the right hardware and detailed knowledge, and the target must be a vulnerable model. We do not describe the attack steps further. Nobody should test these on devices they do not own, and the IT Act treats unauthorised access as an offence.

Who is at risk?

People who handle sensitive calls near others, such as journalists, executives and officials, face the most realistic risk. For most listeners, the risk is low but not zero. Whether your model is affected depends on whether it uses an affected Airoha chip and firmware, so look for your brand in the researchers' list and the maker's advisory.

What can you do now?

  • Check the maker's site and app for firmware updates and install them.
  • Unpair and delete old Bluetooth devices from your phone.
  • Turn Bluetooth off in crowded places when you do not need it.
  • Move sensitive calls to a wired headset or a private place if you think your model is vulnerable and unpatched.
  • Keep your phone updated.

Why does Bluetooth keep having bugs like this?

Bluetooth has many layers (classic, Low Energy, vendor protocols) and each device maker builds on a chip vendor SDK. Updates depend on the manufacturer, and cheap accessories are often never updated. Related reading: the PerfektBlue Bluetooth vulnerability in vehicles, Ubertooth One for Bluetooth security testing in an authorised lab, and a Dell patching example for how coordinated fixes work.

Checklist for IT teams

  1. List which headsets are used by staff in sensitive roles.
  2. Prefer models with a clear update policy.
  3. Add Bluetooth device hygiene to the security awareness training.

Next steps

Next steps: to learn wireless attack and defence legally, see our CEH v13 AI course, and read about PerfektBlue in vehicles.

Frequently Asked Questions

We cannot list them all here, because new ones are published regularly. For this page, the Airoha chip flaws CVE-2025-20700, 20701 and 20702 are the example. Check NVD and vendor advisories for current Bluetooth CVEs.

The Airoha issues are CVE-2025-20700, CVE-2025-20701 and CVE-2025-20702. They cover missing authentication on a GATT service, missing authentication on the BR/EDR interface, and critical capabilities exposed through a custom protocol.

They are generally rated medium to high, but we do not quote exact scores here. Check NVD for current CVSS values. Real-world risk is limited by the need for Bluetooth range and detailed technical skill.

In the research, an attacker in range connected to a vulnerable headset without pairing, then used the weak authentication and a custom protocol to read data and extract keys. We do not describe the steps. Patching removes the risk.

In a research proof of concept, yes, by chaining flaws to impersonate the headset towards a phone. It needs close range, the right hardware and a vulnerable, unpatched model, so it is unlikely for most people.

Bluetooth system-on-chip parts made by Airoha, used in various true wireless earbuds, headphones and speakers. Which products are affected depends on the model and firmware. Check the researchers list and your maker advisory.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0
Vaishnavi

Vaishnavi is a skilled tech professional at the Ethical Hacking Training Institute in Pune, responsible for managing and optimizing the technical infrastructure that supports advanced cybersecurity education. With deep expertise in network security, backend operations, and system performance, she ensures that practical labs, online modules, and assessments run smoothly and securely. Her behind-the-scenes contributions play a vital role in delivering a seamless and secure learning experience for aspiring ethical hackers.