Zig Strike Offensive Toolkit | Evading AV, XDR, and EDR Detection
Discover how Zig Strike uses the Zig language to create evasive payloads that bypass AV, NGAV, and EDR. A red team tool with real-world risk potential.

Table of Contents
- Why Zig Strike Matters in 2025
- Under the Hood: How Zig Strike Generates Stealth
- The Four Injection Methodologies
- Comparing Zig Strike to Other Offensive Frameworks
- Red‑Team Workflow Example
- Defender’s Playbook: Detecting Zig Strike
- Hardening Recommendations
- Ethical and Legal Considerations
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Zig Strike burst onto the offensive‑security scene in 2025 with a bold promise: generate shellcode and DLL payloads that dodge modern AV, NGAV, XDR, and EDR stacks—even Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Built entirely in the fast, memory‑safe Zig programming language, this open‑source framework is already reshaping how red teams craft and deliver attacks. But with great power comes great risk: the same features that thrill penetration testers can super‑charge criminal campaigns if left unchecked.
Why Zig Strike Matters in 2025
-
Built for the post‑Cobalt era – With Cobalt Strike signatures burned into every EDR, adversaries crave novel implant generators.
-
Zig‑native evasion – Compiled Zig binaries have low noise on heuristic engines, slipping past AI‑driven detectors trained on C/C++ patterns.
-
Four injection modes – Local Thread, Local Mapping, Remote Mapping, and Remote Thread give operators flexible choices based on privilege and stealth.
-
Sandbox awareness – TPM checks, domain‑join verification, and time‑delay logic let payloads refuse to run in lab VMs.
Under the Hood: How Zig Strike Generates Stealth
Feature | Purpose | Defender Challenge |
---|---|---|
Manual Shellcode Builder | Operators paste raw shellcode or BOFs to wrap in Zig crypter | Dynamic, unique payload hashes |
String & Import Obfuscation | Zig macros split API calls (e.g., Kernel32 → K\er\ne\l32 ) |
Breaks classical YARA & static rules |
Indirect Syscalls | Calls NT functions via custom stubs | Evades user‑land API hooks in EDR drivers |
Memory Region Stomping | Unmaps PE headers after run‑time load | Hinders memory scanners & dump analysis |
Configurable Sleep Skips | Implements time dilation & CPU spike checks | Detects sandbox acceleration artifacts |
The Four Injection Methodologies
Mode | Typical Use Case | Pros | Cons / Risk |
---|---|---|---|
Local Thread | Post‑exploit on same process | Fast, minimal footprint | Shares process memory; easier hunt |
Local Mapping | Fileless load of encrypted payload | No disk artefacts | Requires RW permissions |
Remote Mapping | Inject into another process via NtMapView |
Hijacks trustworthy process context | May trigger EDR AMSI if sloppy |
Remote Thread | Classic CreateRemoteThread shell injection |
Greater code‑execution flexibility | Oldest method; more detections |
Comparing Zig Strike to Other Offensive Frameworks
Zig Strike | Cobalt Strike | Sliver | Nighthawk | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Language | Zig | C / C++ | Go | C++ |
License | MIT | Commercial | GPL‑3 | Commercial |
Default C2 | HTTP(S) / DNS | HTTP, HTTPS, SMB | MTLS, GRPC | HTTP/2 |
EDR Evasion | Strong (new) | Weak (signatured) | Medium | Strong |
Shellcode Gen | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Price | Free | $$$ | Free | $$$$ |
Red‑Team Workflow Example
-
Generate Shellcode: Convert your custom Beacon‑like implant or BOF into raw bytes.
-
Select Injection Mode: Choose Local Mapping for in‑memory stealth on a post‑exploitation workstation.
-
Enable Sandbox Protections: Tick TPM & domain‑join checks to skip detonation in cloud sandboxes.
-
Compile: Zig outputs a small EXE wrapped with string obfuscation and indirect syscalls.
-
Delivery: Phish user → macro drops loader → executes only on domain‑joined endpoints with TPM.
-
C2 Callback: Payload beacons out over HTTP/3 to an operator listening server protected by Cloudflare Workers.
Defender’s Playbook: Detecting Zig Strike
-
Hunt for Uncommon PE Headers – Zig compilers leave distinctive DOS stub strings like
This program was built for Zig
. -
Memory‑Only MZ Regions – Monitor
NtProtectVirtualMemory
spikes creating RWX pages followed by thread starts. -
Block DNS‑over‑HTTPS to Unknown Domains – Zig Strike templates ship with DoH fallback C2.
-
YARA on Zig Function Epilogues – Early community rules target
lea r12, [rip + 0x??]
patterns in Zig builds. -
TPM Query Logging – Rare legitimate software probes
Win32_Tpm
WMI class at start‑up.
Hardening Recommendations
-
Upgrade to kernel‑mode EDR with hookless ETW telemetry.
-
Implement Code Integrity Guard (CIG) to block unsigned Zig loaders.
-
Lock Down Developer Tools – Prevent in‑house red teamers’ binaries leaking into prod.
-
Enable Device Guard + Credential Guard to resist process injection.
-
Continuous Threat‑Hunting for new, small EXEs signed internally—insider risk is real.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Zig Strike’s creators released it on GitHub under an MIT license, citing “research and red‑team education.” Yet copy‑paste criminals can weaponize it instantly. Organizations should update acceptable‑use policies and ensure that only certified internal teams run such frameworks in controlled environments with written authorization.
Conclusion
Zig Strike signals a turning point: adversaries now embrace modern, memory‑safe languages to craft leaner, meaner payloads. For red teams, the toolkit is a Swiss Army knife that slices through defenses. For blue teams, it’s a wake‑up call to pivot beyond signature‑based detection and embrace behavior, telemetry, and hardware‑rooted protections. The battle for endpoint security just leveled up—again.
FAQ
What is Zig Strike?
Zig Strike is an open-source offensive toolkit built in the Zig programming language designed to create payloads that evade antivirus, XDR, and EDR systems.
Why is Zig Strike significant in cybersecurity?
It marks a new era of AV evasion tools using modern languages like Zig, making detection harder for security tools that focus on traditional programming signatures.
What language is Zig Strike written in?
Zig Strike is written in the Zig programming language, known for being fast, memory-safe, and low-level.
What platforms does Zig Strike target?
Primarily Windows, but payloads may be adapted for cross-platform evasion depending on compilation.
Is Zig Strike open-source?
Yes, it is openly available on platforms like GitHub under MIT license for red team and research use.
Does Zig Strike bypass Microsoft Defender for Endpoint?
Yes, it has features that help evade Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) using stealth injection and anti-sandbox checks.
What types of payloads can Zig Strike create?
It can create shellcode, DLLs, and EXEs that evade detection and perform advanced injection methods.
How does Zig Strike evade sandbox detection?
By using TPM protection, domain join verification, and configurable delay functions that prevent execution in analysis environments.
What are the main injection methods in Zig Strike?
Local Thread, Local Mapping, Remote Mapping, and Remote Thread—each designed for different attack scenarios.
How does Zig Strike handle string obfuscation?
It breaks apart strings and uses Zig macros to make detection by static scanners more difficult.
Can Zig Strike generate fileless payloads?
Yes, especially using Local Mapping or Remote Mapping to avoid writing to disk.
Is Zig Strike malware?
No, Zig Strike is a red team tool, but like many offensive tools, it can be misused by threat actors.
What is the Zig programming language?
Zig is a modern, low-level programming language designed for safety, performance, and cross-compilation—ideal for security tooling.
Why is Zig better than C/C++ for evasion?
Zig binaries often have less recognizable structure, confusing heuristics and signature-based detection engines.
Does Zig Strike include its own C2 (Command and Control)?
No, it focuses on payload creation and injection. C2 must be configured separately.
Is Zig Strike used by cybercriminals?
There’s no public attribution, but tools like this can be exploited if defenders aren’t prepared.
Can Zig Strike evade next-gen antivirus (NGAV)?
Yes, its obfuscation and indirect syscalls make it capable of bypassing many NGAV tools.
What is indirect syscall in Zig Strike?
It uses low-level system calls to execute functions without triggering userland hooks in security software.
How can defenders detect Zig Strike?
By monitoring unusual PE characteristics, low-volume Zig usage, and memory behaviors like RWX allocation and indirect syscalls.
Is Zig Strike suitable for beginners?
No, it requires deep understanding of offensive security, Windows internals, and red team operations.
Can Zig Strike be used in penetration testing legally?
Yes, but only in authorized and scoped engagements with proper client consent.
How can I get Zig Strike?
You can find the project on GitHub or trusted red team repositories.
Is there risk in testing Zig Strike in production?
Yes. Only test in isolated labs. Misuse or leaks could trigger real-world AV alerts.
What anti-analysis techniques are included?
TPM check, domain join check, time-based sandbox evasion, and fileless execution capabilities.
Can Zig Strike payloads be signed?
Yes, but signing with trusted certificates increases risk of misuse and legal consequences.
How often is Zig Strike updated?
As of 2025, it is maintained by the security community. Update frequency varies with contributor activity.
How is Zig Strike different from Cobalt Strike?
Zig Strike focuses on stealth payload generation, not full C2. It’s modular, free, and open source, unlike Cobalt Strike’s licensed model.
Does Zig Strike work against EDR telemetry?
It attempts to avoid it using in-memory execution and indirect techniques, but effectiveness may vary by vendor.
Can Zig Strike generate polymorphic payloads?
Not natively, but through variable obfuscation and compilation, you get similar evasive diversity.
What should organizations do to defend against Zig Strike?
Implement advanced behavioral EDRs, monitor Zig compiler usage, hunt for custom stubs and detect sandbox-aware logic.