Cyber Criminals Use Open-Source Tools to Target African Financial Institutions | How CL-CRI-1014 Works
A sophisticated cybercrime cluster named CL-CRI-1014 is using open-source tools like PoshC2, Chisel, and Classroom Spy to attack banks across Africa. Learn how these tools are misused, what tactics are employed, and how organizations can detect and prevent such breaches.

Table of Contents
- What Makes CL‑CRI‑1014 Different?
- Attack Flow at a Glance
- Key Open‑Source Tools in the Arsenal<
- Why Financial Firms in Africa?
- Real‑World Impact
- Detection and Mitigation Tips
- Broader Trend: From IABs to Ransomware
- Key Takeaways for Security Leaders
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Africa’s booming digital‑payments market has attracted more than customers—it has become a lucrative hunting ground for initial‑access brokers (IABs) who break into banks, fintechs, and insurance firms, then auction off that foothold to ransomware and fraud crews. Since mid‑2023, one such cluster—CL‑CRI‑1014—has quietly compromised multiple financial organizations across the continent by abusing open‑source and publicly available tools to masquerade as legitimate software and evade detection.
What Makes CL‑CRI‑1014 Different?
-
Criminal Reseller Model – Instead of deploying ransomware immediately, the operators harvest credentials and sell remote access on dark‑web markets.
-
Legitimate‑Looking Payloads – Executables are re‑signed with forged signatures and branded with icons from Microsoft Teams, Palo Alto Cortex, or VMware Tools to blend into corporate fleets.
-
All Open‑Source Stack – Tools like PoshC2, Chisel, MeshCentral, and Classroom Spy require zero custom malware development, lowering cost and attribution risk.
Attack Flow at a Glance
Stage | Tool / Tactic | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Initial Foothold | Unknown (phish, exposed RDP, VPN?) | Gain first workstation or server access |
Remote Command & Control | MeshCentral Agent | Establish persistent back‑door shell |
GUI Surveillance & Control | Classroom Spy | Live desktop viewing, keystroke logging |
Lateral Movement | PoshC2 with encoded PowerShell | Pivot to other Windows hosts, harvest credentials |
Firewall Evasion | Chisel reverse‑proxy tunnel | Exfiltrate data / redirect C2 over allowed outbound ports |
Persistence | Windows Service, Startup LNK, Scheduled Task labelled “Palo Alto Cortex Services” | Ensure restart survival |
Monetization | Dark‑web forums, ransomware affiliates | Sell access or partner with extortion crews |
Key Open‑Source Tools in the Arsenal
Tool | Category | Legitimate Use | Malicious Use in Campaign |
---|---|---|---|
PoshC2 | Post‑exploitation C2 | Red‑team automation | Credential theft, proxy relay |
Chisel | TCP/UDP tunneling | Remote debugging, NAT bypass | Covert data exfil over HTTPS |
MeshCentral | Remote‑desktop manager | IT help‑desk support | Stealth persistence gateway |
Classroom Spy | Classroom monitoring | Teacher screen sharing | Hidden RDP‑style surveillance |
Why Financial Firms in Africa?
-
Rapid digitization of banking outpaces security budgets.
-
Regional regulations may lag behind PCI DSS or EU‑style mandates.
-
Banks often rely on third‑party core‑banking vendors, widening the supply‑chain attack surface.
-
African institutions provide an easier bargaining target for ransom or access resale due to limited incident‑response resources.
Real‑World Impact
-
Stolen domain admin creds sold for $5 000–$15 000 per network on initial‑access forums.
-
Infected banks observed mystery scheduled tasks named after security products—causing SOC analysts to dismiss them as legitimate.
-
Financial data siphoned through Chisel tunnels disguised as outbound Microsoft Teams traffic.
Detection and Mitigation Tips
Hunt for Suspicious Services
-
Query Windows Event Log for new services pointing to unconventional paths (e.g.,
C:\Users\Public\TeamsUpdate.exe
running PowerShell).
Inspect Outbound Proxies
-
Monitor for long‑lived connections to uncommon cloud IPs on ports 443, 8080, or 53—signature of Chisel reverse tunnels.
Validate File Signatures
-
Use tools like SigCheck to verify that binaries signed as Microsoft or Palo Alto actually chain to trusted certificates.
Apply Least‑Privilege & MFA
-
Enforce multi‑factor authentication on VPN/RDP, limit domain‑admin group membership, and rotate privileged credentials after any alert.
Block Living‑off‑the‑Land Binaries
-
Constrain PowerShell to ConstrainedLanguageMode; disable or restrict
InstallUtil
,MSBuild
, and other LOLBins leveraged by PoshC2.
Broader Trend: From IABs to Ransomware
Unit 42’s findings echo previous African campaigns like DangerousSavanna (2022) and the global rise of Dire Wolf ransomware (2025). Initial‑access brokers now package turnkey footholds—complete with mapped subnets and admin creds—then sell them to ransomware crews who deploy Go‑based lockers capable of killing services, deleting shadow copies, and demanding multi‑million‑dollar payments.
Key Takeaways for Security Leaders
-
Open‑source ≠ harmless – Free pentest frameworks make powerful post‑exploitation platforms for criminals.
-
Identity is the new perimeter – Compromised credentials remain the fastest path to bank networks; invest in password hygiene and MFA.
-
Threat intel matters – Tracking clusters like CL‑CRI‑1014 helps anticipate toolsets and update detection rules.
-
Assume breach, plan for containment – Build rapid isolation playbooks and practice them through purple‑team exercises.
In a region racing to modernize its financial systems, Africa’s banks must pair innovation with robust cyber defenses. The rise of CL‑CRI‑1014 proves that adversaries will happily leverage public tools and forged software icons to stay a step ahead—unless defenders raise the bar with vigilant monitoring, strong authentication, and continuous threat‑hunting.
FAQs
What is CL-CRI-1014?
CL-CRI-1014 is a threat actor group targeting financial institutions in Africa using open-source tools and acting as initial access brokers (IABs).
What are initial access brokers?
Initial access brokers gain unauthorized entry into networks and sell this access to other cybercriminal groups, often for ransomware deployment.
Which African sectors are targeted by CL-CRI-1014?
Mainly financial sectors including banks, fintech companies, and insurance organizations.
Which tools does CL-CRI-1014 use?
They use PoshC2, Chisel, Classroom Spy, and MeshCentral—tools that are open-source and often used by ethical hackers.
What is PoshC2 used for?
PoshC2 is a post-exploitation command-and-control (C2) framework used for remote command execution and persistence.
What does Chisel do in cyber attacks?
Chisel is used to tunnel malicious traffic and bypass firewalls by acting as a reverse proxy.
What is Classroom Spy?
Originally designed for remote classroom monitoring, Classroom Spy is misused by attackers for spying on victim systems.
How do attackers evade detection?
They forge software signatures, use well-known icons like Microsoft Teams, and blend their tools with legitimate applications.
How is persistence achieved in these attacks?
Through services, LNK startup files, and scheduled tasks disguised as security software processes.
What are the risks of open-source tools?
While open-source tools aid legitimate researchers, cybercriminals can weaponize them due to their public availability and lack of built-in protections.
What is MeshCentral?
MeshCentral is a remote administration tool that can be repurposed by attackers for stealthy backdoor access.
Are these attacks ongoing?
Yes, attacks have been active since mid-2023 and are still under observation as of 2025.
What is the purpose of stealing credentials?
To reuse them for deeper access, lateral movement, and resale to ransomware affiliates.
How do attackers spoof software?
They copy icons, file names, and even digital certificates from legitimate software like Palo Alto Cortex.
How does Chisel avoid detection?
By using encrypted channels over commonly allowed outbound ports such as 443 (HTTPS).
What can organizations do to prevent such attacks?
Enforce MFA, restrict admin access, monitor unusual outbound traffic, and validate software authenticity.
Is this type of attack unique to Africa?
No, but Africa's rapid financial digitization and relatively lower security budgets make it a prime target.
What kind of data is stolen?
Login credentials, session tokens, and potentially financial transaction records or customer data.
What is the role of ransomware in this campaign?
Access brokers often sell access to ransomware operators who encrypt data and demand ransom payments.
What is the significance of the name CL-CRI-1014?
CL = Cluster, CRI = Criminal Motivation, 1014 is likely an internal tracking ID used by Unit 42.
Is this linked to any known ransomware families?
CL-CRI-1014 activity resembles pre-ransomware intrusion tactics used by groups affiliated with lockers like Dire Wolf.
How does Dire Wolf ransomware differ?
Dire Wolf disables logging, kills services, and deletes shadow copies using Go-based malware.
Are similar tactics used globally?
Yes, open-source tools like PoshC2 and Chisel are part of the broader trend of “living off the land” cyber attacks.
What should financial SOC teams monitor?
New Windows services, outbound tunnels on 443, and use of PowerShell or LOLBins like MSBuild and InstallUtil.
How can open-source communities respond?
By educating users, improving documentation on responsible use, and raising alerts when their tools are abused.
Are antivirus solutions effective?
Not always—open-source tools often evade detection unless specifically flagged through behavioral analysis.
How do attackers use Microsoft Teams icons?
They package their malware with familiar icons to fool users and evade suspicion from admins.
What role do underground forums play?
They act as marketplaces for initial access sales, ransomware partnerships, and malware-as-a-service deals.
Is spear-phishing involved?
Spear-phishing was used in previous related attacks (like DangerousSavanna) and likely plays a role here too.
How can companies detect PoshC2 activity?
By analyzing PowerShell logs, outbound C2 patterns, and endpoint behavior linked to persistence artifacts.
Should institutions block open-source tools?
Not necessarily, but they should monitor and restrict unauthorized use within production environments.