Insecure vs Secure Ports: Clear-Text Protocols, Their Replacements and How to Fix Them

This blog explains the critical differences between insecure and secure ports in network security for 2026, including a detailed comparison table. Learn why insecure ports like FTP (21), Telnet (23), and HTTP (80) are outdated, and how secure alternatives like SFTP (22), SSH (22), and HTTPS (443) protect sensitive data through encryption. Includes real-world examples and best practices.

Jul 12, 2025 - 11:41
Updated: 1 month ago
103.6k
Insecure vs Secure Ports: Clear-Text Protocols, Their Replacements and How to Fix Them

Quick answer: A port number is not secure or insecure. The protocol using it is. "Insecure ports" usually means services that send data in clear text, such as Telnet (23), FTP (21), HTTP (80), POP3 (110) and IMAP (143). The secure replacements are SSH (22), SFTP, HTTPS (443), POP3S (995) and IMAPS (993). Move to encrypted protocols and close ports you do not need.

Key takeaways

  • The protocol, not the port number, decides whether data is encrypted. Moving Telnet to another port does not make it secure.
  • Clear-text protocols expose passwords and data to anyone who can capture the traffic.
  • Replacements: SSH for Telnet, SFTP or FTPS for FTP, HTTPS for HTTP, encrypted mail ports for POP3, IMAP and SMTP.
  • Find insecure services by scanning your own network and listing listening ports on each server.
  • Migrate in order: inventory, replace, restrict, then monitor.

What is the difference between insecure and secure ports?

Strictly speaking, ports are neither. A port is a number that identifies a service on a host. What matters is whether the protocol on that port encrypts and authenticates traffic. We say "insecure port" as shorthand for a port normally used by a protocol that sends data, including passwords, in clear text.

The original version of this post included a story about a university network misconfiguration. We could not verify it, so we removed it. A related reference is our post on the idea of "old and new" port numbers.

Which clear-text protocols should be replaced?

Insecure protocol (port)ProblemSecure replacement (port)
Telnet (23)Everything in clear text, including passwordsSSH (22)
FTP (21, 20)Credentials and files in clear textSFTP over SSH (22) or FTPS (990 or explicit TLS on 21)
HTTP (80)Traffic can be read and alteredHTTPS (443)
POP3 (110)Mail and passwords in clear textPOP3S (995), or better IMAP with TLS
IMAP (143)Clear text without STARTTLSIMAPS (993)
SMTP (25)No encryption by defaultSubmission 587 with STARTTLS, or SMTPS 465
LDAP (389)Clear-text binds unless protectedLDAPS (636) or StartTLS
SNMP v1 or v2c (161)Community strings in clear textSNMPv3 with authentication and encryption
TFTP (69)No authentication or encryptionSFTP or a secured, internal-only transfer method
DNS (53)Queries visible and spoofableDNS over TLS (853) or DNS over HTTPS (443), plus DNSSEC
NetBIOS, SMBv1 (137 to 139, 445)Legacy, weak protocolSMBv3 with encryption, NetBIOS disabled

For more detail on other ports see our lists of top 20 network ports and commonly used TCP and UDP ports.

Why does it matter?

Anyone who can see the traffic, such as someone on the same Wi-Fi, a compromised switch or a malicious network device, can read clear-text credentials. They can also alter data in transit. Encrypted protocols also check the server's identity, which blocks many man-in-the-middle attacks.

Lab: see clear text for yourself

In your own lab, install an FTP server on one virtual machine, start Wireshark on another on the same host-only network, log in with a test account, and apply the display filter ftp. You will see the username and password in the packet details. Repeat with SFTP and notice that the content is unreadable. This is a safe way to learn why we replace FTP. See the Wireshark documentation. Only capture traffic on networks you own.

How do you find insecure services on your network?

  • On each Linux server, list listening ports: ss -tulpn.
  • From a management host, scan your own address ranges with Nmap, for example nmap -sV 192.168.1.0/24, with permission for the range.
  • Review firewall rules for allowed 21, 23, 80, 110, 143 and 445 from untrusted networks.
  • Check network devices, printers and cameras, which often keep Telnet or HTTP management on.

How do you migrate safely?

  1. Inventory each service, its users and why it exists.
  2. Enable the encrypted version and test with a few users or systems.
  3. Update clients and scripts that use the old protocol.
  4. Redirect or block the old port. For web, redirect HTTP to HTTPS and consider HSTS.
  5. Restrict by network where the old service must remain, and plan its retirement.
  6. Monitor for attempts on closed ports.

On RHEL, you can remove a service from the firewall with firewall-cmd --permanent --remove-service=telnet and then firewall-cmd --reload.

Common mistakes

  • Believing a service on a high port is secure.
  • Enabling HTTPS but leaving HTTP open without a redirect.
  • Replacing FTP with FTPS using a self-signed certificate that users learn to ignore.
  • Forgetting devices such as printers and cameras.

Next steps

Next steps: to practise securing network services, see our Computer Network course, and read about common network ports.

Frequently Asked Questions

A port number itself is neither. Insecure ports usually carry protocols that send data in clear text, such as Telnet, FTP and HTTP. Secure ports carry encrypted protocols, such as SSH, SFTP and HTTPS.

Commonly cited ones are 21 (FTP), 23 (Telnet), 80 (HTTP), 110 (POP3), 143 (IMAP), 25 (SMTP without encryption), 69 (TFTP) and 161 (SNMP v1 or v2c). The problem is the clear-text protocol, not the number.

Use SSH on port 22 instead of Telnet, and SFTP over SSH or FTPS instead of FTP. These encrypt credentials and data in transit and are supported by standard clients and servers.

No. Moving Telnet or FTP to another port only hides it from casual scans. The traffic is still clear text and attackers scan all ports. Switch to an encrypted protocol.

List listening ports with ss -tulpn on servers, scan your own address ranges with Nmap using permission, review firewall rules and check devices such as printers and cameras that often leave old management services on.

Port 443 normally carries HTTPS, which uses TLS, but security depends on current TLS versions, valid certificates and good configuration. Another service can also be run on port 443, so verify what is actually running.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0
Vaishnavi

Vaishnavi is a skilled tech professional at the Ethical Hacking Training Institute in Pune, responsible for managing and optimizing the technical infrastructure that supports advanced cybersecurity education. With deep expertise in network security, backend operations, and system performance, she ensures that practical labs, online modules, and assessments run smoothly and securely. Her behind-the-scenes contributions play a vital role in delivering a seamless and secure learning experience for aspiring ethical hackers.