How BlackEye Compares With Other Phishing Toolkits: A Defender's Comparison

BlackEye is a widely used phishing toolkit that enables attackers and ethical hackers to create fake login pages to steal credentials. However, there are several other phishing frameworks, such as Zphisher, SocialFish, HiddenEye, Evilginx2, and GoPhish, that offer similar or enhanced functionalities. This blog provides an in-depth comparison of BlackEye with other phishing toolkits, analyzing key aspects like ease of use, features, customization, detection resistance, and legal applications. We discuss how these tools work, their ethical and legal considerations, and which tools are best suited for ethical hacking and penetration testing. Additionally, we highlight why GoPhish is the best legal alternative for conducting phishing awareness campaigns. Finally, we answer 30 frequently asked questions about BlackEye and phishing toolkits to help you understand their capabilities, risks, and best practices.

Feb 04, 2025 - 09:59
Updated: 16 days ago
109.5k
How BlackEye Compares With Other Phishing Toolkits: A Defender's Comparison

Quick answer: BlackEye and Zphisher are static page cloners that capture typed passwords. Evilginx is a reverse proxy that can also capture session cookies and bypass many MFA types. Gophish is a simulation platform for authorised awareness training. Phishing-resistant MFA such as passkeys defeats the proxy type; all use needs written authorisation.

Key takeaways

  • Compare tools by type: static cloner, reverse proxy, simulation platform.
  • Cloners capture typed credentials; proxy frameworks can capture session cookies.
  • Phishing-resistant MFA is the strongest control against proxy-style attacks.
  • Use Gophish-style platforms for training, and only with written approval; unauthorised phishing breaches the IT Act.

Why compare these tools at all?

If you defend a network, you need to know what the tools criminals and red teams use can do, because that tells you which controls actually work. If you run phishing awareness training, you need to know which tool is legitimate for that job. This comparison is written for those two purposes. It does not explain how to run a phishing campaign against real people.

Legal note: sending a phishing message or hosting a fake login page that imitates a real service to real users, without authorisation, is an offence in India. Sections 66C (identity theft) and 66D (cheating by personation using a computer resource) of the IT Act are the usual ones cited, along with other criminal provisions. A sanctioned phishing exercise needs written approval from the organisation, a defined scope and, in most companies, sign-off from HR and legal.

What are the three kinds of phishing tool?

The tools in this family fall into three groups. The group matters more than the individual name.

TypeExamplesHow it worksWhat it capturesMain defence
Static page clonersBlackEye, Zphisher and similar scriptsServe a copy of a login page and record what is typed into itUsernames and passwordsAny second factor, URL and brand checking, user awareness
Reverse-proxy (adversary-in-the-middle) frameworksEvilginxSit between the user and the real site, passing traffic both waysPasswords and the session cookie after login, so some MFA is bypassedPhishing-resistant authentication such as passkeys or FIDO2 security keys, device-bound sessions, conditional access
Awareness and simulation platformsGophishManages campaigns, templates, landing pages and reporting for authorised exercisesClick and submit statistics for trainingNot an attack tool, but needs written authorisation

BlackEye and its relatives

BlackEye is an open-source script that serves cloned login pages for well-known services and logs what a visitor submits. Zphisher and others belong to the same family and share the same weakness: they can only collect what the user types. Template counts and "evasion" claims in older comparisons are not reliable and change between versions, so this article does not repeat them.

What matters for defenders:

  • A cloned page lives on a domain that is not the real one. Teach people to read the address bar and use a password manager, which will not autofill on the wrong domain.
  • Even a stolen password is of little use if the account requires a second factor the attacker cannot supply.
  • Mail filtering and web filtering can block known phishing domains and newly registered lookalike domains.

Evilginx and why it matters

Evilginx is a reverse-proxy framework published as a red team and research tool: Evilginx2 on GitHub. Because the victim really is talking to the real site through the proxy, the attacker can capture the session cookie after the user completes MFA. One-time codes and push approvals do not stop this. That is the reason security teams are moving to phishing-resistant methods, which tie authentication to the real domain. NIST's digital identity guidance discusses authenticator strength: NIST Special Publications.

It is a powerful tool and should only be used by trained testers under a signed engagement.

Gophish for legitimate training

Gophish is an open-source phishing simulation framework: Gophish on GitHub. It lets an organisation send test emails, host landing pages and measure who clicked, who submitted details and who reported the message. Use it with:

  1. Written approval and a clear scope.
  2. Landing pages that never store the real password. Record only that a submission occurred.
  3. A training page shown straight after a click, explaining what to look for.
  4. A way for staff to report suspicious mail, and credit for those who do.

Compliance claims from older articles, such as "used for GDPR and SOC 2", are not accurate. A simulation tool supports a training programme. It does not make an organisation compliant.

Which should you learn?

  • Defender or student: understand how a cloner works in a lab using a dummy login page you built yourself, then study AiTM and how passkeys stop it.
  • Running awareness training: use a simulation platform, not a cloner.
  • Red team: proxy frameworks under written authorisation.

Defence checklist

  • Phishing-resistant MFA for admins and high-value accounts first.
  • Email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) on your own domains.
  • Block newly registered and lookalike domains where possible.
  • Short session lifetimes and alerts for impossible-travel or new-device sign-ins.
  • A simple report-phish button and a response playbook.

Next steps

To practise social engineering defence and testing in a legal lab, see the Certified Ethical Hacking CEH v13 AI course. Read legal uses for BlackEye-style tools and whether BlackEye still works for more.

Related reading

Frequently Asked Questions

BlackEye is an open-source script that serves cloned login pages for popular websites and records what visitors type. It is a static page cloner. Using it against real people without authorisation is illegal.

Both are static page cloners from the same family that capture typed credentials. Details such as templates and features change between versions, so compare them in a lab, not from older articles.

Only tools used under written authorisation are legal in practice. Simulation platforms such as Gophish are designed for approved awareness training, while cloners and proxy frameworks should be restricted to authorised tests and labs.

Static cloners cannot defeat a second factor on their own. Reverse-proxy frameworks such as Evilginx can capture session cookies after login, so SMS codes and push approvals may not stop them. Phishing-resistant methods do.

Use phishing-resistant authentication such as passkeys or security keys, a password manager that checks domains, email authentication and filtering, and regular awareness training with an easy way to report suspicious messages.

Creating fake pages or messages to obtain credentials can fall under Sections 66C and 66D of the IT Act and other criminal laws. Authorised simulations need written permission and a defined scope.

What's Your Reaction?

Like Like 0
Dislike Dislike 0
Love Love 0
Funny Funny 0
Wow Wow 0
Sad Sad 0
Angry Angry 0
Vaishnavi

Vaishnavi is a skilled tech professional at the Ethical Hacking Training Institute in Pune, responsible for managing and optimizing the technical infrastructure that supports advanced cybersecurity education. With deep expertise in network security, backend operations, and system performance, she ensures that practical labs, online modules, and assessments run smoothly and securely. Her behind-the-scenes contributions play a vital role in delivering a seamless and secure learning experience for aspiring ethical hackers.